4.6 Article

Tourism, social representations and empowerment of rural communities at Langue de Barbarie National Park, Senegal

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1383-1402

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1855437

关键词

Social representations; empowerment; rural communities; tourism; protected areas; Senegal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores social representations across 10 communities surrounding the Langue de Barbarie National Park in Senegal, finding that most community members hold polemical representations viewing tourism and the park as a continuity of colonialism, while a minority with emancipated representations advocate for alternative tourism structures.
Evidence of tourism as a strategy to empower local communities around national parks remains elusive. Scholars argue that a prerequisite to empowering community members is to decipher their ideas, beliefs and perceptions. Social representations (SR) theory provides a framework to engage in such a task yet very few studies have taken on such analysis. The paper presents a study of the SR across 10 communities surrounding the Langue de Barbarie National Park in Senegal using survey and interview data. Specifically, we examine their representations towards tourism and the park as a basis to better inform their empowerment process. We conducted a cluster analysis, grouping community members responses into polemical, emancipated, and hegemonic representations. Most participants held polemical representations and perceived tourism and the park as a continuity of colonialism. Others with emancipated representations advocated for alternative tourism structures. The hegemonic representations on the other hand assessed tourism based on the direct impact it provides to individual members of their communities. For each cluster, we propose a form of empowerment that is better aligned with their social representations as a catalyst for their capacity to carve a meaningful space in tourism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据