4.7 Article

Kappa opioid receptor controls neural stem cell differentiation via a miR-7a/Pax6 dependent pathway

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 600-616

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/stem.3334

关键词

adult stem cells; cell signaling; microRNA; neural differentiation; neural stem cells; signal transduction; transcriptional regulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701313]
  2. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University [2020ZG53]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that OPRK1 agonists inhibit adult neurogenesis in the mouse hippocampus by upregulating the expression of miR-7a, which in turn downregulates Pax6/Neurog2/NeuroD1 activities and hinders neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells.
Although the roles of opioid receptors in neurogenesis have been implicated in previous studies, the mechanism by which kappa-opioid receptor (OPRK1) regulates adult neurogenesis remains elusive. We now demonstrate that two agonists of OPRK1, U50,488H and dynorphin A, inhibit adult neurogenesis by hindering neuronal differentiation of mouse hippocampal neural stem cells (NSCs), both in vitro and in vivo. This effect was blocked by nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), a specific antagonist of OPRK1. By examining neurogenesis-related genes, we found that OPRK1 agonists were able to downregulate the expression of Pax6, Neurog2, and NeuroD1 in mouse hippocampal NSCs, in a way that Pax6 regulates the transcription of Neurog2 and Neurod1 by directly interacting with their promoters. Moreover, this effect of OPRK1 was accomplished by inducing expression of miR-7a, a miRNA that specifically targeted Pax6 by direct interaction with its 3 '-UTR sequence, and thereby decreased the levels of Pax6, Neurog2, and NeuroD1, thus resulted in hindrance of neuronal differentiation of NSCs. Thus, by modulating Pax6/Neurog2/NeuroD1 activities via upregulation of miR-7a expression, OPRK1 agonists hinder the neuronal differentiation of NSCs and hence inhibit adult neurogenesis in mouse hippocampus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据