4.4 Article

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

期刊

PARASITE
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2021001

关键词

Alveolar echinococcosis; Laparoscopic hepatectomy; Minimally invasive

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region [2017D01C322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A retrospective study on 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University showed that this approach is safe and effective for treating hepatic alveolar echinococcosis, with minimal postoperative complications. Further comparisons with traditional open surgery are needed to determine the advantages of laparoscopic hepatectomy for AE treatment.
Background: At present, laparoscopy is relatively mature as a minimally invasive technique, but there are few reports on this approach for the radical treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for AE treatment. Results: A retrospective review of medical records obtained from 13 patients diagnosed with AE between January 2018 and December 2019 and treated with laparoscopic hepatectomy was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. All patients (n = 13) underwent hepatic resection using laparoscopy and none were transferred to open surgery. The average duration of surgery was 285 min (145-580 min). Intraoperative bleeding was 305 mL (20-2000 mL). The mean duration of postoperative catheterization was 6.9 days (3-21 days), and postoperative hospital stay was 7.2 days (4-14 days). No complication of Clavien-Dindo grade III or above occurred, except for the second patient with acute liver failure post-surgically. No recurrences or deaths were observed at 9-30 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Laparoscopic hepatectomy appears to be safe and effective in selected AE patients. The advantages of this technique for AE treatment need to be further compared with the classical open approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据