4.4 Article

Facile two-step electrochemical approach for the fabrication of nanostructured nickel oxyhydroxide/SS and its studies on oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

CHEMICAL PAPERS
卷 75, 期 6, 页码 2485-2494

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-020-01441-6

关键词

Cathodic deposition; Anodic activation; Nickel oxyhydroxide; Oxygen evolution reaction; Energy storage

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2020/201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potential electro-catalyst, amorphous nickel oxyhydroxide, was successfully prepared on a stainless steel substrate using a simple cathodic deposition followed by anodic activation method. The amorphous nickel oxyhydroxide@SS material exhibited good catalytic performance and stability, with the OER proceeding through the formation of NiO2 intermediate. The experimental results also highlighted the significant impact of cathodic deposition time on the interfacial charge transfer resistance and OER performance.
The fabrication of an efficient electro-catalyst, made of non-precious metals, for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is an exciting task. A simple cathodic deposition followed by electrochemical anodic activation has been proposed to prepare a potential electro-catalyst, amorphous nickel oxyhydroxide, on a stainless steel (SS) substrate wherein the whole fabrication procedure completes within a minute. The proposed protocol demonstrates good electrical contact between loosely packed amorphous nickel oxyhydroxide and SS substrate. The experimental results demonstrate cathodic deposition time significantly affect interfacial charge transfer resistance and in turn OER performance. Electrochemical results reveal OER proceeds through the formation of NiO2 intermediate. The amorphous nickel oxyhydroxide@SS fabricated using cathodic deposition time of 40 s followed by anodic activation of 15 s display the low overpotential of 330 mV@25 mA cm(-2) (1.56 V vs. RHE) with long-term stability over 70 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据