4.5 Article

Problem Behavior and Life Satisfaction in Early Adolescence: Longitudinal Findings in a Chinese Context

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 2889-2914

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00346-1

关键词

Bidirectional relationship; Chinese adolescents; Problem behavior; Life satisfaction; Gender difference

资金

  1. Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust [5-ZH67]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found bidirectional associations between problem behavior and life satisfaction, with both types of problem behavior negatively predicting future life satisfaction. Changes in life satisfaction also negatively predicted changes in problem behavior. The prediction of internalizing behavior on life satisfaction appeared to be stronger and more persistent for boys than for girls.
This study tested the reciprocal relationships between problem behavior (PB) and life satisfaction (LS) as well as the relationships between their trajectories of change. Using a three-wave dataset collected from 3,328 Chinese junior secondary school students in Hong Kong, this study identified bidirectional associations between PB and LS. For PB, while externalizing behavior was indexed by '' delinquent behavior '' and '' problem behavioral intention '', internalizing behavior was indexed by '' deliberate self-harm '' and '' suicidal behavior ''. As expected, both types of PB negatively predicted future LS. Besides, changes in PB also negatively predicted changes in LS. While the predictions of externalizing behavior on LS were similar among boys and girls and declined over time, the prediction of internalizing behavior appeared to be stronger and more persistent for boys than for girls. A novel finding was that while earlier LS positively predicted later PB, changes in LS negatively predicted changes in PB over time. The present findings underscore the dynamic relationships between problem behavior and life satisfaction over time and across genders in early adolescent years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据