4.6 Article

Carbon Composite Anodes with Tunable Microstructures for Potassium-Ion Batteries

期刊

BATTERIES & SUPERCAPS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 663-670

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/batt.202000306

关键词

potassium-ion batteries; carbon composite anodes; graphite; soft carbon; synergistic effect

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/R021554/2, EP/S018204/2]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Batteries Network [ST/R006873/1]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Henri Sawistowski Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a variety of carbon composite materials were designed to investigate the roles of different carbon structural features in potassium ion insertion. The graphite-soft carbon composites were found to have high charge capacity and good reversibility, due to the presence of soft carbon inhibiting the formation of solid electrolyte interface layer.
Among the post-lithium battery technologies, potassium-ion batteries are promising for cost-effective large-scale energy storage, as potash is an abundant resource. However, a major challenge is to understand the structure-performance relationships of carbon anodes for potassium-ion storage. In this study, we have designed a variety of carbon composite materials from 100 % graphite to 100 % soft carbon and in between, with tunable structural features to fundamentally understand the roles of different carbon structural features in potassium ion insertion. We have found that the graphite-soft carbon composites (G-SC) show a high charge capacity of 280.2 mAh g(-1) with an increased initial coulombic efficiency, representing the best reversibility among different carbon composites. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and ex-situ structural characterizations have been applied to substantiate that the presence of soft carbon in G-SC inhibits the solid electrolyte interface layer formation and provides structural protection to the graphitic layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据