4.8 Article

GlycoPOST realizes FAIR principles for glycomics mass spectrometry data

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 D1, 页码 D1523-D1528

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Database Integration Coordination Program of the National Bioscience Database Center (NBDC), Japan Science and Technology Agency [17934031, 18063028]
  2. Database Integration Coordination Program of the National Bioscience Database Center (NBDC), Japan Science and Technology Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The principle of FAIRness is crucial for the reproducibility and sustainability of scientific research, and the development of the GlycoPOST repository for glycomics MS data has already attracted researchers from around the world and significantly contributed to the future FAIRness of the field.
For the reproducibility and sustainability of scientific research, FAIRness (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable), with respect to the release of raw data obtained by researchers, is one of the most important principles underpinning the future of open science. In genomics and transcriptomics, the sharing of raw data from next-generation sequencers is made possible through public repositories. In addition, in proteomics, the deposition of raw data from mass spectrometry (MS) experiments into repositories is becoming standardized. However, a standard repository for such MS data had not yet been established in glycomics. With the increasing number of glycomics MS data, therefore, we have developed GlycoPOST (https://glycopost.glycosmos.org/), a repository for raw MS data generated from glycomics experiments. In just the first year since the release of GlycoPOST, 73 projects have already been registered by researchers around the world, and the number of registered projects is continuously growing, making a significant contribution to the future FAIRness of the glycomics field. GlycoPOST is a free resource to the community and accepts (and will continue to accept in the future) raw data regardless of vendor-specific formats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据