3.8 Article

Block Chain Technology and Trust in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

出版社

OSCM FORUM
DOI: 10.31387/oscm0450297

关键词

blockchain technology; supply chain; trust.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores how applying blockchain in supply chain management can affect trust, proposing a research agenda. Discussions on trust and blockchain technology are scattered in literature, with a gap in linking trust theories to blockchain applications. The current literature expects trust as a consequence of blockchain adoption, but also highlights the importance of trust in supply chain partners as an antecedent to blockchain.
Applying blockchain technology for information sharing in supply chain is driven by many factors, but developing trust is one of the most proposed. However, trust is a multidimensional, intangible concept without an agreed-upon definition. Whereas some argue that trust is the main driver of blockchain technology, others have found a negative relationship. This study focuses on how applying blockchain in supply chain management can influence trust and proposes a corresponding research agenda. Trust and blockchain technology discussions are scattered throughout the literature. Thus, a systematic literature review was performed based on a conceptual trust framework. This study discovered a gap in linking trust theories to blockchain technology applications especially in supply chain management, and provided insights into trust's reciprocal nature. Current literature strongly expects trust as a consequence for blockchain adoption if considered in the technology. Simultaneously, trust in supply chain partners is strongly expected as an antecedent to blockchain because it requires openness in information sharing. Thus, propositions and agenda for future research are suggested. The research is limited to literature findings due to the immaturity and low scalability of blockchain technology adoption; however, the most reviewed articles in less than two years old, increase the results' accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据