4.6 Article

Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Learning: An Examination Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 6798-6809

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048708

关键词

Technology integration; technology acceptance model (TAM); TPACK; motivational support; social norm; emerging technology; augmented reality; virtual reality

资金

  1. Incheon National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that TPACK has a significant influence on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, while social norm influences perceived usefulness; additionally, motivational support has an impact on perceived ease of use, which then affects attitudes and behavioral intention.
As the educational possibilities of AR (Augmented Reality) and VR (Virtual Reality) are getting more attention, understanding teachers' readiness to integrate new technologies for instruction would help researchers and practitioners to plan how to support them. In this regard, the present study explores teachers' willingness to integrate AR and VR technologies for teaching and learning practices. Employing an extended Technology Acceptance Model (eTAM), this study investigated whether technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), social norm (SN), and motivational support (MS) for teachers influence teachers' intention to use the technologies. Analysis from 292 in-service teacher responses supported all of the eight hypotheses formulated in the study. TPACK was found to have a significant influence on perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) while SN influenced PU. In addition, MS was found to have an influence on PEU, which ultimately affects attitudes toward technology use (ATU) and then behavioral intention (BI). The results imply the importance of providing technology professional development (PD) and support for teachers to promote the use of AR and VR in classrooms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据