4.7 Article

Black widow formation by pulsar irradiation and sustained magnetic braking

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3358

关键词

binaries: close; stars: evolution; pulsars: general

资金

  1. Heising-Simons Foundation
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black widows are millisecond pulsars with low-mass companions in long orbits. These companions are likely remnants of main-sequence stars that lost mass through ablation and radiation from the pulsar. Research suggests that ablation-driven magnetic braking can effectively reduce the companion's mass, and the pulsar's irradiating luminosity influences the companion's temperature.
Black widows are millisecond pulsars with low-mass companions, a few per cent the mass of the sun, on orbits of several hours. These companions are presumably the remnants of main-sequence stars that lost their mass through a combination of Roche lobe overflow and ablation by the host pulsar's high-energy radiation. While ablation itself is too weak to significantly reduce the mass of the companion star, the ablated wind couples to its magnetic field, removes orbital angular momentum, and thus maintains stable Roche lobe overflow. We use the MESA stellar evolution code, complemented by analytical estimates, to track initially main-sequence companions as they are reduced to a fraction of their original mass by this ablation-driven magnetic braking. We argue that magnetic braking remains effective even for low-mass companions. A key ingredient of our model is that the irradiating luminosity of the pulsar L-irr deposits energy in the companion's atmosphere and thereby slows down its Kelvin-Helmholtz cooling. We find that the high-energy luminosities measured by Fermi L-irr = 0.1-3 L-circle dot can explain the span of black widow orbital periods. The same Lirr range reproduces the companions' night-side temperatures, which cluster around 3000 K, as inferred from optical light curves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据