4.6 Article

Comparative evolutionary genetics of deleterious load in sorghum and maize

期刊

NATURE PLANTS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-00834-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative analysis of genomic variations between sorghum and maize revealed prevalent deleterious mutations in both species, particularly in pericentromeric regions, with sorghum showing a lower post-domestication genetic load compared to maize. This research provides insights into the evolutionary dynamics of deleterious variants in sorghum and offers a framework for prioritizing these variants for removal through genome editing and breeding.
Sorghum and maize share a close evolutionary history that can be explored through comparative genomics(1,2). To perform a large-scale comparison of the genomic variation between these two species, we analysed ~13 million variants identified from whole-genome resequencing of 499 sorghum lines together with 25 million variants previously identified in 1,218 maize lines. Deleterious mutations in both species were prevalent in pericentromeric regions, enriched in non-syntenic genes and present at low allele frequencies. A comparison of deleterious burden between sorghum and maize revealed that sorghum, in contrast to maize, departed from the domestication-cost hypothesis that predicts a higher deleterious burden among domesticates compared with wild lines. Additionally, sorghum and maize population genetic summary statistics were used to predict a gene deleterious index with an accuracy greater than 0.5. This research represents a key step towards understanding the evolutionary dynamics of deleterious variants in sorghum and provides a comparative genomics framework to start prioritizing these variants for removal through genome editing and breeding. Comparative genomics revealed similar distribution patterns of deleterious mutations in maize and sorghum but a post-domestication reduction of genetic load in sorghum, which is probably caused by sorghum's high selfing rate and unique domestication history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据