4.6 Article

Artificial intelligence and automation in computer aided synthesis planning

期刊

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 27-51

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0re00340a

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  3. Wallenberg Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Systems, and Software Program (WASP)
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the development of synthesis planning technologies and the relevance of computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP) in drug discovery and development. It emphasizes the need for an automated synthesis platform to enhance chemical workflows, and highlights the interaction between experimental and computational scientists as a key driver of technological development.
In this perspective we deal with questions pertaining to the development of synthesis planning technologies over the course of recent years. We first answer the question: what is computer assisted synthesis planning (CASP) and why is it relevant to drug discovery and development? We draw a distinction between discovery and development, focusing on their differing requirements. We highlight the need for an automated synthesis platform which chemists can use to augment their workflows and what it entails. The interaction between experimental and computational scientists is emphasized as a key driver in the development of such technologies. Advances in the development and application of algorithms is then covered, drawing a distinction between physics based and statistical or data driven modelling paradigms, their use in, and how they contribute to augmented drug discovery and development. Finally, developments in the coupling of artificial intelligence and automation are discussed. Throughout, we emphasize the need for an inter-disciplinary approach, blurring the distinction between fields in the pursuit of artificial intelligence and automated platforms that can be integrated into chemical workflows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据