4.6 Article

High efficiency removal of Pb(II) in aqueous solution by a biochar-supported nanoscale ferrous sulfide composite

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 953-959

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra08055a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876115]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LGF20C030001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FeS@biochar was successfully prepared and demonstrated effective removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions, with a higher removal rate compared to other adsorbents. Kinetic and isotherm models showed good fit with experimental results, with the removal controlled by chemical reactions and monolayer adsorption on the surface. The mechanisms of Pb(II) removal included electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, physical adsorption, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation, showcasing FeS@biochar's potential for environmentally friendly wastewater treatment.
A biochar-supported nanoscale ferrous sulfide composite was prepared and applied for the treatment of Pb(II) ions in aqueous solution. The experimental results of SEM, EDS, XRD, and FT-IR spectroscopy clearly implied that the biochar was successfully modified with nanoscale ferrous sulfide composite. The maximum adsorption capacity of Pb(II) ions by FeS@biochar reached 88.06 mg g(-1). Compared with other reported adsorbents, the removal rate of Pb(II) ions by FeS@biochar was higher. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model could better fit the experimental adsorption results. The removal rate of Pb(II) ions by FeS@biochar was controlled by the chemical reaction and monolayer adsorption on the surface of FeS@biochar. The mechanisms of Pb(II) removal from aqueous solutions by biochar involved electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, physical adsorption, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation. Additionally, the chemical stability and reusability of FeS@biochar were good. It is also an environment-friendly material for low-cost wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据