4.6 Article

Bio-engineered palladium nanoparticles: model for risk assessment study of automotive particulate pollution on macrophage cell lines

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 1850-1861

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09336j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that bio-engineered palladium nanoparticles have significant toxic effects on murine macrophage cell lines, causing cell membrane damage and apoptosis at high doses. Results show that the toxicity of palladium nanoparticles is dependent on both time and dosage.
The surge in vehicular activity in densely populated areas has led to an increased concentration of airborne palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) in the environment. Recent toxicity data have indicated that PdNPs exhibit adverse effects in in vitro and in vivo models, however, their effect on the immune system is not fully understood. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to evaluate possible toxic effects of bio-engineered palladium nanoparticles on the murine macrophage cell line (J774). Here we prepared palladium nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Parthenium hysterophorus and characterized them by UV-Vis spectroscopy, XRD, FT-IR spectroscopy, HR-TEM, EDX, SEM and zeta potential. Toxicity parameters such as cell viability, cell membrane integrity, induction of apoptosis and ROS production were assessed on J774 cell lines. Spherical palladium nanoparticles of mean size similar to 4 nm, when subjected to time and dose-dependent cytotoxicity assay, showed cell viability was >95% at lower doses (25, 200 mu g mL(-1)) and <50% at higher doses of palladium nanoparticles (400, 500 mu g mL(-1)) after 24 hours of incubation. We also observed cell membrane injury at higher doses by lactate dehydrogenase assay. The induction of apoptosis observed was moderate. H(2)DCFDA assay revealed visible cell damage which could be due to modest levels of ROS generation. The detection of Pd in the road-dust samples of New Delhi using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) technique was also investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据