4.8 Article

Boron carbonitride with tunable B/N Lewis acid/base sites for enhanced electrocatalytic overall water splitting

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 2849-2854

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr06857h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872162, 11890700]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018MEM013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designed and synthesized self-supporting BCN materials with different enrichment degrees of B/N using carbon paper as substrate, achieving an optimum electrocatalytic performance for overall water splitting. The strategy of synthesizing materials with different heteroatom enrichment has opened up new opportunities for developing efficient metal-free electrocatalysts.
In-depth research on energy storage and conversion is urgently needed; thus, water splitting has become a possible method to achieve sustainable energy utilization. However, traditional carbon material with high graphitization degree exhibits a relatively low electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity as it is electrochemically inert. In this work, according to the Lewis theory of acids and bases and the density functional theory (DFT) results, which show that the enriched heteroatom of B/N in the boron carbonitride (BCN) system may introduce stronger adsorption strength of OH*/H2O, respectively, we have designed and synthesized self-supporting BCN materials with different enrichment degrees of B/N (B-BCN/N-BCN) using carbon paper as substrate. Furthermore, by adjusting the contents of B and N, the optimum electrocatalytic performance of overall water splitting was obtained in which the onset voltage of water splitting on B-BCN//N-BCN was lower than 1.60 V. Our strategy of synthesizing materials with different heteroatom enrichment to improve the electronic environment of materials has opened up new opportunities for developing efficient metal-free electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据