4.6 Article

Exploring recollision of ultrafast electrons from photoelectron momentum distributions using single-cycle near-infrared laser pulses

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0307702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11674363, 91850121, 11504412]
  3. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2019-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electron scattering process in a hydrogen atom exposed to a near-infrared laser field was investigated by analyzing interference patterns in the photoelectron momentum distribution. The interference structures in the PMD reflect the scattering process, with the spider-like pattern stripe density being influenced by the recollision time of the scattering electron trajectories.
The electron scattering process has been investigated by analyzing the interference structure in the photoelectron momentum distribution (PMD) of a hydrogen atom exposed to a single-cycle linearly polarized near-infrared laser field, based on the numerical solution of the full-dimensional time-dependent Schrodinger equation and the Coulomb correlative classical trajectory simulation. The interference pattern in the PMD is closely related to the form of the ultrashort pulse which is dominated by the carrier-envelope phase. A fish-bone-like pattern appears in the PMD using the sine electric field and a spider-like pattern appears using the cosine electric field. These interference structures reflect the scattering process. It is found that the stripe density of the spider-like pattern is mainly dominated by the recollision time of scattering electron trajectories, i.e., the longer the recollision time, the greater the stripe density. Therefore, the photoelectron interference pattern can be used to understand the ionization and scattering processes, and identify these processes on the attosecond time scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据