4.6 Article

Extracting correlation effects from momentum-resolved electron energy loss spectroscopy: Synergistic origin of the dispersion kink in Bi2.1Sr1.9CaCu2O8+x

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.035121

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative [GBMF 4305, GBMF 8691]
  2. Quantum Sensing and Quantum Materials, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0021238]
  3. NSF [DMR-1919143]
  4. DOE [DE-FG02-05ER46236]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021238] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the kink feature in cuprates is mainly caused by electron-phonon coupling, where the contribution of phonons leads to the appearance of kink features in the single-particle spectra.
We employ momentum-resolved electron energy loss spectroscopy (M-EELS) on Bi2.1Sr1.9CaCu2O8+x to resolve the issue of the kink feature in the electron dispersion widely observed in the cuprates. To this end, we utilize the GW approximation to relate the density response function measured in M-EELS to the self-energy, isolating contributions from phonons, electrons, and the momentum dependence of the effective interaction to the decay rates. The phononic contributions, present in the M-EELS spectra due to electron-phonon coupling, lead to kink features in the corresponding single-particle spectra at energies between 40 and 80 meV, independent of the doping level. We find that a repulsive interaction constant in momentum space is able to yield the kink attributed to phonons in ARPES. Hence, our analysis of the M-EELS spectra points to local repulsive interactions as a factor that enhances the spectroscopic signatures of electron-phonon coupling in cuprates. We conclude that the strength of the kink feature in cuprates is determined by the combined action of electron-phonon coupling and electron-electron interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据