4.1 Article

Suitability of the Openly Accessible 3D Printed Prosthetic Hands for War-Wounded Children

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.594196

关键词

prosthetics; assistive technologies; war-wounded; 3D printing; grasping

类别

资金

  1. Qatar University [IRCC-2019-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The field of rehabilitation and assistive devices is being disrupted by innovations in desktop 3D printers and open-source designs, especially for upper limb prosthetics. However, basic interfacing issues need to be addressed, while considering functionality, durability, and price for those in difficult living conditions.
The field of rehabilitation and assistive devices is being disrupted by innovations in desktop 3D printers and open-source designs. For upper limb prosthetics, those technologies have demonstrated a strong potential to aid those with missing hands. However, there are basic interfacing issues that need to be addressed for long term usage. The functionality, durability, and the price need to be considered especially for those in difficult living conditions. We evaluated the most popular designs of body-powered, 3D printed prosthetic hands. We selected a representative sample and evaluated its suitability for its grasping postures, durability, and cost. The prosthetic hand can perform three grasping postures out of the 33 grasps that a human hand can do. This corresponds to grasping objects similar to a coin, a golf ball, and a credit card. Results showed that the material used in the hand and the cables can withstand a 22 N normal grasping force, which is acceptable based on standards for accessibility design. The cost model showed that a 3D printed hand could be produced for as low as $19. For the benefit of children with congenital missing limbs and for the war-wounded, the results can serve as a baseline study to advance the development of prosthetic hands that are functional yet low-cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据