4.1 Article

Old frames and new lenses: Frames of reference revisited

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 114-125

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022185620983968

关键词

Frames of reference; Marxism; pluralism; radical pluralism; unitarism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of 'frames of reference' in industrial/employment relations, originally developed by Alan Fox, has remained a significant feature with limited scholarly research on its development. This special issue reviews existing literature to explore new and historical perspectives on frames, questioning the continued relevance of traditional frames in understanding employer and employee behavior amidst current changes in work and employment. Reflecting on Alan Fox's influence, the aim is to chart a forward-looking research agenda that builds upon his insights in adapting to the evolving field.
The 'frames of reference' concept has been a significant and enduring feature of industrial/employment relations since being developed by Alan Fox; and yet there has been only limited scholarly research seeking to develop the frames. We introduce this special issue by reviewing the extant literature on frames which provides a backdrop to the five article contributions that explore the frames in both new and historical light. The special issues ask the following questions: Do the traditional frames continue to provide insights into the perceptions and behaviour of employers and employees? If not, how might existing frames be broadened by new (or indeed historical) developments and insights? A re-examination of frames of reference is both important and timely given the many changes currently impacting work and employment. Our hope is that by reflecting on and celebrating the influence of Alan Fox on our thinking, we can also chart a forward-looking research agenda that continues to use his insights and apply them to the field as well as developing and continuing to engage with them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据