4.7 Article

A two-stage model for forecasting consumers' intention to purchase with e-coupons

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102289

关键词

Electronic coupon redemption; Consumer segmentation; Logistic regression; Isolation forest; Data-driven strategy

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71620107002, 71821001, 71971095, 61502360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A two-stage hybrid model is proposed in this study, which effectively analyzes the usage characteristics of e-coupons by consumer segmentation and model construction for different consumer segments, improving prediction performance and consumer satisfaction.
E-coupons (electronic coupons) have been a mainstay of online marketing to attract consumers and promote them to repeat purchase, distributing right e-coupons to right consumers is of critical importance. In big data era, analyzing consumers preferences for e-coupons by their online behavior and the impact of data imbalance caused by low active consumers are rarely studied. Thus, we propose a two-stage hybrid model. Firstly, consumer segmentation is implemented to analyze behavioral characteristics for each segment and distinguish low active consumers, then models are constructed for different consumer segments. The proposed model is applied to a real online consumption data. Consumers are aggregated into four segments: potential e-coupons user, low discount sensitive user, high discount sensitive user (including discount preference and fixed preference). The first one is defined as low active consumer segment and others are high active consumer segments. Isolation forest model and logistic regression model are respectively constructed for them. Result shows that data imbalance is effectively relieved, prediction performance is also significantly better than the traditional approaches. Finally, e-coupons' usage characteristics for each consumer segment are summarized, according to that, companies can increase sales and improve consumer satisfaction as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据