4.6 Review

Forest and Landscape Restoration: A Review Emphasizing Principles, Concepts, and Practices

期刊

LAND
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10010028

关键词

literature review; forest restoration; human dimension of restoration; ecosystem services; landscape ecology; project management

资金

  1. WeForest asbl
  2. Higher Education Improvement Coordination (CAPES) [88882.180110/2018-01, 1708853]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified main FLR concepts and definitions in literature from 1980 to 2017, highlighting variations in principles and their link with practice. The research provides a starting point for future tools to improve guidance frameworks for FLR, emphasizing the lack of social aspects in FLR projects.
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR) is considered worldwide as a powerful approach to recover ecological functionality and to improve human well-being in degraded and deforested landscapes. The literature produced by FLR programs could be a valuable tool to understand how they align with the existing principles of FLR. We conducted a systematic qualitative review to identify the main FLR concepts and definitions adopted in the literature from 1980 to 2017 and the underlying actions commonly suggested to enable FLR implementation. We identified three domains and 12 main associated principles-(i) Project management and governance domain contains five principles: (a) Landscape scale, (b) Prioritization, (c) Legal and normative compliance, (d) Participation, (e) Adaptive management; (ii) Human aspect domain with four principles: (a) Enhance livelihoods, (b) Inclusiveness and equity, (c) Economic diversification, (d) Capacity building; (iii) Ecological Aspects domain with three principles: (a) Biodiversity conservation, (b) Landscape heterogeneity and connectivity, (c) Provision of ecosystem goods and services. Our results showcase variations in FLR principles and how they are linked with practice, especially regarding the lack of social aspects in FLR projects. Finally, we provide a starting point for future tools aiming to improve guidance frameworks for FLR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据