4.6 Article

The Spatial Pattern of the Absorption of Cohesion Policy Funds in Polish Rural Areas

期刊

LAND
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10010026

关键词

rural areas; Cohesion Policy; absorption of EU funds; rural development level; spatial pattern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the extent to which rural areas in Poland have benefitted from the EU's Cohesion Policy, finding that around 40% of CP funds were allocated to 40% of the country's rural areas. The study also explores the spatial distribution of fund absorption and the main social and economic factors associated with high absorption levels.
This paper determines the extent to which rural areas in Poland have been beneficiaries of the EU's Cohesion Policy (CP). The amount of funds allocated to rural areas at the local (gmina/commune) level as part of the total CP obtained by Poland from 2007 to 2018 was estimated. The spatial distribution of that allocation was then determined. Whether the level of absorption is linked to the separately computed rural development level in communes was examined. This then made it possible not just to determine the spatial pattern of the absorption of CP funds but also to identify the main social and economic correlates of their high levels of absorption. It was found that nearly 40% of CP funds for Poland were allocated to rural areas, inhabited by 40% of the country's population. However, this seemingly balanced allocation was somewhat undermined by its spatial distribution: the highest absorption was reported in over a third of communes with a high level of development while it was also found in less than a fifth of communes with a low level of development. Communes with higher levels of absorption have a more favourable local budget situation and a high degree of deagrarianisation of their local economies. The absorption level is more highly correlated with the variables characterising the extent to which an agricultural area has turned into a multifunctional area than with a commune's absorptive capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据