4.5 Article

Defective molybdenum disulfide nanosheet for elemental mercury capture in simulated flue gas

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 120-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2020.11.007

关键词

MoS2; Defect; Mercury removal; Nanostructure; Metal sulfide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076126]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1416200]
  3. Senior Talent Foundation of Jiangsu University [18JDG017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A defect-rich MoS2 nanosheet was synthesized and applied for adsorptive capture of elemental mercury (Hg-0) in simulated flue gas at low temperature, showing excellent Hg-0 removal performance. The Hg-0 removal efficiency of the defective MoS2 nanosheet was all above 93% within the temperature range of 25-150 degrees C. Mo-4(+), S-2(-), and S-2(2-) ions participated in the Hg-0 removal process.
Two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides have gained increasing concerns because of their distinct structural features and also display great potential in mercury removal. Herein, a defect-rich MoS2 nanosheet is synthesized by using hydrothermal method and applied for adsorptive capture of elemental mercury (Hg-0) in simulated flue gas at low temperature. It exhibits excellent Hg-0 removal performance due to its ultra-thin lamellar and defective structures with ample exposed adsorption sites. The Hg-0 removal efficiency of the defective MoS2 nanosheet is all above 93% when the reaction temperature is within 25-150 degrees C. Besides, presence of NO has no influence on Hg-0 removal, while SO2 subtly reduces the Hg-0 removal efficiency due to competitive adsorption. Mo-4(+), S-2(-), and S-2(2-) ions take part in the Hg-0 removal process, which transfers Hg-0 into Mo-Hg amalgam and HgS. The process of Hg-0 adsorption on the defective MoS2 nanosheet obeys the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic model. (C) 2020 Energy Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据