4.3 Article

The role of norms and collective efficacy for the importance of techno-economic vehicle attributes in Germany

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 1113-1128

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1919

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie [03ET4041A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the influences on consumer adoption of electric vehicles, finding that subjective norms, collective efficacy, technological risk attitude, and perceived information were the strongest predictors for purchase intention. Participants' attitudes towards these factors affected their evaluation of vehicle attribute importance in the choice experiment, but overall favored electric vehicles.
The shift to electric mobility lags pursued goals. In this article we analyze the consumer's perspective and examine, which technology attributes and person-related factors influence electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and whether differences in person-related factors affect vehicle attribute importance. A total of 1922 participants took part in a Germany-wide, representative study comprising a questionnaire measuring person-related factors and a discrete choice experiment determining the importance of technology-specific attributes. Results from the choice experiment for all vehicles classes reveal that purchase price was the most important vehicle attribute. Less important for the choice of a small-sized vehicle were in descending order: range, fuel costs, fuel type, refueling infrastructure, CO2-emissions and CO2-tax. Regression analyses further indicate that subjective norms, collective efficacy, technological risk attitude and perceived information were the strongest predictors for purchase intention in the questionnaire. Participants showing high values on these factors also weighted attribute importance in the choice experiment differently, but throughout favoring EVs, than participants with low values on these factors. Factors that are disadvantageous for EV, such as range and price, were de-emphasized by these respondents. In addition, preference shares for battery electric vehicles were more than twice as high as for conventional vehicles in three out of four groups with high values. Socio-psychological factors, therefore, seem to relativize the impact of mere techno-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Hence, we recommend that these factors receive greater attention in the discourse on policy measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据