3.8 Review

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency liver disease

出版社

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.23

关键词

Autophagy; proteolysis; ER-associated degradation (ERAD); protein polymer; siRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical presentation of liver disease in homozygous ZZ alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is highly variable, with neonatal cholestatic hepatitis being the most common pediatric presentation. Diagnosis of AAT deficiency is determined through analysis of AAT protein phenotype in patient serum or their DNA genotype. Treatment currently focuses on supportive care, with liver transplant being required in rare cases.
The clinical presentation of liver disease is highly variable in homozygous ZZ alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, and not all patients with the homozygous ZZ genotype develop liver disease. Although not fully identified, there is likely a strong influence of genetic and environmental modifiers of the intracellular injury cascade and fibrotic response. Most ZZ children are well and remain undiagnosed. Of those who come to medical attention, the most common pediatric presentation is neonatal cholestatic hepatitis, sometimes referred to as neonatal hepatitis syndrome. The gold standard for diagnosis of AAT deficiency is analysis of the AAT protein phenotype in the patient serum or the genotype of their DNA genome. Careful follow up of all diagnosed children is important. Heterozygotes for S and Z alleles of AAT (SZ) may develop progressive liver disease similar to ZZ patients and also require close monitoring. There is no specific treatment for AAT deficiency induced liver disease and current therapy remains supportive with management of complications. Rarely, patients require liver transplant and typically the patient outcomes are excellent. With improved understanding of liver injury mechanisms, new strategies for treatment are now being explored, including siRNA technology, molecules to modulate secretion, and enhancers of proteolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据