4.4 Article

Principal-Agent Relationship Within a Cruise Supply Chain Model for China

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 998-1021

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1096348020985328

关键词

cruise; tourism supply chain; principal-agent theory; travel agency; distribution; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that changes in travelers' booking habits and business practices in Mainland China have led to power imbalances between cruise companies and travel agents. As the number of agents grows, they begin to overpower the cruise companies, and alliances among travel agents further impact the principal-agent relationship.
Changes in travelers' booking habits and the evolution of technology have come to threaten the existence of traditional travel agents (TAs). However, the cruise industry still relies heavily on TAs as its main distribution channel. A qualitative study was conducted to investigate the networks, relationships, and power distribution between cruise companies and TAs using a triangulation method via a tourism supply chain model. Principal-agent (P-A) theory was taken as the framework to describe various parties' relationships and roles. Several TA business models were identified, including group blocks (i.e., guaranteed and nonguaranteed) and charter cruises (i.e., retail for resale and corporate; meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions). Results show an imbalance of power between parties due to unique business practices and customer preferences in Mainland China. Principals (i.e., cruise companies) were found to rely excessively on agents (i.e., TAs) to create demand, with the growing number of cruise lines leading agents to overpower principals. The alliance among TAs further affected the principal-agent relationship. A refined tourism supply chain model tailored to the cruise industry is thus proposed herein; this cruise supply chain model simplifies the complicated business network relationships between cruise companies and TAs in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据