4.8 Article

Unusual light-driven amplification through unexpected regioselective photogeneration of five-membered azaheterocyclic AIEgen

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 709-717

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc04725b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21871060, 81271476, 31870991]
  2. Innovation and Technology Commission [ITC-CNERC14SC01, ITCRD/17-9]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [C6009-17G, A-HKUST605/16, N-HKUST609/19]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0190200]
  5. Grassland Talent program of Inner Mongolia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel synthetic method to construct five-membered heterocyclic compounds with AIE characteristics under mild conditions, and achieves significant progress in cancer cell recognition and fluorescent patterning through a light-driven amplification strategy.
Developing versatile synthetic methodologies with merits of simplicity, efficiency, and environment friendliness for five-membered heterocycles is of incredible importance to pharmaceutical and material science, as well as a huge challenge to synthetic chemistry. Herein, an unexpected regioselective photoreaction to construct a fused five-membered azaheterocycle with an aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristic is developed under mild conditions. The formation of the five-membered ring is both thermodynamically and kinetically favored, as justified by theoretical calculation and experimental evidence. Markedly, a light-driven amplification strategy is proposed and applied in selective mitochondria-targeted cancer cell recognition and fluorescent photopattern fabrication with improved resolution. The work not only delivers the first report on efficiently generating a fused five-membered azaheterocyclic AIE luminogen under mild conditions via photoreaction, but also offers deep insight into the essence of the photosynthesis of fused five-membered azaheterocyclic compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据