4.1 Article

Optimization of multi-site nicking mutagenesis for generation of large, user-defined combinatorial libraries

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzab017

关键词

antibody engineering; combinatorial mutagenesis; enzyme engineering; molecular evolution; nicking mutagenesis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [2030221]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01AI141452]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [2030221] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an optimized combinatorial mutagenesis method using template-based nicking mutagenesis to generate high coverage mutation libraries, which achieved 99% or higher coverage for two antibody fragments. The updated method allows for the quick generation of desired libraries in just 2 days with approximately 140-fold sequencing depth coverage.
Generating combinatorial libraries of specific sets of mutations are essential for addressing protein engineering questions involving contingency in molecular evolution, epistatic relationships between mutations, as well as functional antibody and enzyme engineering. Here we present optimization of a combinatorial mutagenesis method involving template-based nicking mutagenesis, which allows for the generation of libraries with >99% coverage for tens of thousands of user-defined variants. The non-optimized method resulted in low library coverage, which could be rationalized by a model of oligonucleotide annealing bias resulting from the nucleotide mismatch free-energy difference between mutagenic oligo and template. The optimized method mitigated this thermodynamic bias using longer primer sets and faster annealing conditions. Our updated method, applied to two antibody fragments, delivered between 99.0% (32451/32768 library members) to >99.9% coverage (32757/32768) for our desired libraries in 2 days and at an approximate 140-fold sequencing depth of coverage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据