4.6 Article

Quantitative response to nitrite from field-induced decomposition of the chloride adduct of RDX by reactive stage tandem ion mobility spectrometry

期刊

ANALYST
卷 146, 期 2, 页码 565-573

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0an01778g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rapiscan Detection Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing an additional dimension of selectivity through field-induced decomposition of RDX in ion mobility spectrometry enables the selective detection of RDX in the absence of interfering peaks. Quantitative determination of RDX is achieved through sequential ion processing, selective field-induced decomposition, and mobility analysis during a second drift region.
An additional dimension of selectivity for the determination of RDX by ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) was introduced through field-induced decomposition of RDX center dot Cl- to NO2- on a spectral baseline free of interfering peaks. In this variant of reactive stage tandem IMS, the explosive ion is decomposed selectively in the presence of an interferent and from significantly convolved peaks which were mobility isolated within a narrow range of drift times using dual ion shutters. Field-induced decomposition at 170 degrees C and field strength of 112 Td (similar to 16 kV cm(-1)) provided 15% decomposition yield and RDX, amid interferent, was detected decisively even when peaks differed in reduced mobility coefficients (K-o) by only 0.02 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). A nitrite peak with S/N of 8.5 was observed with vapour concentrations of 54 ppb for RDX and 329 ppb for Interferent A in the ionization volume corresponding to 2 ng of RDX and 100 ng of Interferent A deposited on sample traps in the thermal desorption inlet. Findings on quantitative response suggest the presence of excessive amounts of interferent caused ionization suppression of RDX. Still, RDX was determined quantitatively using sequential processing of ions by mobility isolation, selective field induced decomposition, and mobility analysis in a second drift region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据