4.6 Article

An Outlier Robust Finite Impulse Response Filter With Maximum Correntropy

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 17030-17040

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053212

关键词

Kalman filter; finite impulse response; maximum correntropy criterion; state estimation

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel robust MCFIR filter was proposed to deal with the state estimation problem in the linear state-space system corrupted by outliers. Gaussian correntropy was used to improve the filter's robustness to outlier interference. An unbiased MCFIR filter was derived that ignores noise statistics, and an improvement bias-constrained MCFIR filter was proposed to achieve better estimate accuracy.
Non-Gaussian noise is common in industrial applications, and it is a severe challenge to existing state estimators. In this paper, a novel robust maximum correntropy finite impulse response (MCFIR) filter is proposed to deal with the state estimation problem in the linear state-space system corrupted by outliers. The filter operates as a finite memory form, and thus it obtains superior immunity to noise statistics and process uncertainties than existing Kalman-like robust filters. Gaussian correntropy is adopted to generate a new cost function, which improves the filter robustness to outlier interference. We derive an unbiased MCFIR filter that ignores noise statistics and propose an improvement bias-constrained MCFIR filter to achieve better estimate accuracy. To improve the filtering performance degradation caused by improper kernel size, an adaptive kernel size algorithm is further proposed, which adjusts the bandwidth within a specific range adaptively and achieves significant improvement in the MCFIR filter. An illustrative example based on moving target tracking is presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed filter, and simulation results confirmed that the MCFIR filter obtained superior immunity to outliers than the existing robust filters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据