4.5 Article

Extraction of causal relations based on SBEL and BERT model

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/database/baab005

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61976147, 2017YFB1002101]
  2. UGC under GRF projects [PolyU YW4H]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the use of Simplified Biological Expression Language (SBEL) and BERT model to extract causal relations, aiming to enhance the performance of extracting complex BEL statements in biomedical text mining. By decomposing BEL statement extraction into SBEL statements and utilizing the BERT model for entity relation and function extraction, the performance of extracting entity relations and functions is ultimately improved.
Extraction of causal relations between biomedical entities in the form of Biological Expression Language (BEL) poses a new challenge to the community of biomedical text mining due to the complexity of BEL statements. We propose a simplified form of BEL statements [Simplified Biological Expression Language (SBEL)] to facilitate BEL extraction and employ BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers) to improve the performance of causal relation extraction (RE). On the one hand, BEL statement extraction is transformed into the extraction of an intermediate form-SBEL statement, which is then further decomposed into two subtasks: entity RE and entity function detection. On the other hand, we use a powerful pretrained BERT model to both extract entity relations and detect entity functions, aiming to improve the performance of two subtasks. Entity relations and functions are then combined into SBEL statements and finally merged into BEL statements. Experimental results on the BioCreative-V Track 4 corpus demonstrate that our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance in BEL statement extraction with F1 scores of 54.8% in Stage 2 evaluation and of 30.1% in Stage 1 evaluation, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据