4.7 Article

IPTV Channel Zapping Recommendation With Attention Mechanism

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 538-549

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2020.2984094

关键词

IPTV; recommender system; realtime recommendation; fusion method; attention mechanism; neural networks

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan key project, China [201704030124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a large IPTV dataset, this paper analyzes channel zapping behaviors of IPTV users to generate more accurate channel zapping recommendations. A deep neural network model, consisting of a Recommender System Attention module and a Channel Attention module, is developed to further improve recommendation accuracy.
Internet Protocol TV (IPTV) normally has the advantage of providing far more TV channels than the traditional TV services, while as the other side of the coin it has the problem of information overload. Users of IPTV usually have difficulties finding channels matching their interests. In this paper, using a large IPTV dataset, we analyze channel zapping behaviors of IPTV users and discover various patterns that can be used to generate more accurate channel zapping recommendations. Based on user behavior analysis, we develop several base and fusion recommender systems that generate in real-time a short list of channels for users to consider whenever they want to switch channels. A deep neural network model that consists of a Recommender System Attention (RS Attention) module and a Channel Attention module capturing the static and dynamic user switching behaviors is also developed to further improve the recommendation accuracy. Evaluation on the IPTV dataset demonstrates that our fusion recommender can achieve 41% hit ratio with only three candidate channels, and our attention neural network model further pushes it up to 45%. Our recommender systems only take as input user channel zapping sequences, and can be easily adopted by IPTV systems with low data and computation overheads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据