4.6 Article

Adaptive Network Slicing in Multi-Tenant 5G IoT Networks

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 14048-14069

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051940

关键词

5G; Internet of Things (IoT); network management; network slicing; quality of service (QoS); software defined networks (SDN)

资金

  1. European Commission through the project 6G Bringing Reinforcement learning Into Radio Light Network for Massive Connections (BRAINS) [H2020-ICT-2020-2/101017226]
  2. University of the West of Scotland 5G (UWS 5G) Video Laboratory project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of 5G technology with IoT can provide innovative solutions for various vertical business IoT use cases, and network slicing is a key technology for enabling multi-tenant networks.
The Fifth Generation (5G) mobile networking coupled with Internet of Things (IoT) can provide innovative solutions for a wide range of uses cases. The flexibility of virtualized, softwarized and multi-tenant infrastructures and the high performance promised by 5G technology are key to cope with the deployment of the IoT use cases demanded by various vertical businesses. Such 5G IoT use cases incur challenging Quality of Service (QoS) requirements especially connectivity for millions of IoT devices to achieve massive Machine-Type Communication (mMTC). In addition, network slicing is a key enabling technology in 5G multi-tenant networks to create logical virtualized networks for delivering customised solutions to meet diverse QoS requirements. This work presents a 5G IoT framework with network slicing capabilities able to manage a vast number of heterogeneous IoT network slices dynamically on demand. The proposed solution has been empirically tested and validated in five realistic vertical-oriented IoT use cases. The achieved results demonstrate a excellent stability, isolation and scalability while being able to meet extreme QoS requirements even in the most congested and stressful scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据