4.6 Article

Handover Management of Drones in Future Mobile Networks: 6G Networks

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 12803-12823

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051097

关键词

Drones; Wireless communication; Handover; 6G mobile communication; Switches; Reliability; Prediction algorithms; Connected drones; unmanned aerial vehicles; UAV; handover; mobility management; drones; heterogeneous; 6G networks

资金

  1. International Fellowship for Outstanding Researchers Program of TUBTAK [2232, 118C276]
  2. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drones will play a significant role in future mobile communication networks, but pose challenges, especially in handover management due to their mobility in a 3D environment. Current research efforts focus on addressing these challenges and integrating drones into heterogeneous networks for future developments.
Drones will be a significant part of future mobile communication networks, serving as mobile users or acting as mobile base stations at sky. Although they will provide several solutions related to mobile communication networks and other non-communication services, drones also possess numerous challenges, especially when it comes to their handover management. Unlike terrestrial networks, drones are mobile devices that move in a three-dimension (3D) environment, which further complicates mobility issues. Therefore, this paper provides an overview on the handover management for connected drones in the future mobile networks. The study summarizes how current research efforts approach the issues that characterize drones, with special focus on the handover process. This work also provides a general concept of drone integration in heterogeneous networks and discusses specific solutions for addressing possible problems. This survey further offers a brief discussion and guidance for upcoming research directions related to connected drones in future heterogeneous networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据