3.8 Article Book Chapter

Birdsong Learning and Culture: Analogies with Human Spoken Language

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF LINGUISTICS, VOL 7
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 449-472

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-090420-121034

关键词

vocal learning; culture; songbirds; spoken language; vocal coordination

资金

  1. Columbia University Presidential Scholars in Society and Neuroscience program
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Rockefeller University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the similarities and differences between vocal learning bird species and humans across various levels, suggesting that the cultural transmission of vocal repertoires is a natural outcome of vocal learning evolution. The balance between genetic constraints and social environment features allows for the propagation of cultural learning in both birdsong and human vocal culture.
Unlike many species, song learning birds and humans have independently evolved the ability to communicate via learned vocalizations. Both birdsong and spoken language are culturally transmitted across generations, within species-specific constraints that leave room for considerable variation. We review the commonalities and differences between vocal learning bird species and humans, across behavioral, developmental, neuroanatomical, physiological, and genetic levels. We propose that cultural transmission of vocal repertoires is a natural consequence of the evolution of vocal learning and that at least some species-specific universals, as well as species differences in cultural transmission, are due to differences in vocal learning phenotypes, which are shaped by genetic constraints. We suggest that it is the balance between these constraints and features of the social environment that allows cultural learning to propagate. We describe new opportunities for exploring meaningful comparisons of birdsong and human vocal culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据