4.6 Article

Telomere length as a function of age at population level parallels human survival curves

期刊

AGING-US
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 204-218

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

关键词

telomere; mortality deceleration; aging; lifespan

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN: Progetti di Ricerca di rilevante Interesse Nazionale - 2015) [20157ATSLF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that after 70 years of age, there is a decrease in white blood cell telomere length, followed by an increase after 92 years; meanwhile, there is a sharp increase in mortality after 70 years, which slows down after 90 years, corresponding to the trend of telomere length. Generalized LTL attrition may exacerbate senescence, increasing the risk of high mortality.
Telomeres are subject to age related shortening which can be accelerated by oxidative stress and inflammation. Many studies have reported an inverse correlation between telomere length and survival, but such inverse correlation has not been always confirmed in different populations. We analyzed the trend of Leukocyte Telomere Length (LTL) as a function of age in a cohort of 516 subjects aged 65-106 years from Southern Italy. The trend of LTL obtained was quite similar to demographic survival curves reported with data of western societies. We observed a decrease of LTL after 70 years of age and then an increase after 92 years, in agreement with the sharp decrease of survival after 70 years of age and its increase after 90 years, due to the deceleration of mortality at old ages. Our data suggest that a generalized LTL attrition after 70 years of age, associated to organismal decline, affects most of the population. Such generalized attrition may exacerbate senescence in these subjects, predisposing them to high mortality risk. Conversely, the subjects with better physical conditions, experience a lower attrition and, consequently, a delayed senescence, contributing to the deceleration of mortality which has been observed among very old subjects in modern societies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据