3.8 Review

The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: A Review of Published Research

期刊

NEUROTRAUMA REPORTS
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 149-164

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neur.2020.0047

关键词

generalizability; longitudinal cohort study; outcome measures; traumatic brain injury; Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reviewed works using TBIMS data for analysis in the past 5 years and found that most studies focused on specific outcome measures, with some also considering data aspects. Sample sizes varied greatly, with 42 longitudinal studies assessing follow-up from 1 to 5 years. TBIMS is a valuable resource for large-sample longitudinal TBI outcome analyses, but the main limitation mentioned in the studies was generalizability.
The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) is the largest longitudinal TBI data set in the world. Our study reviews the works using TBIMS data for analysis in the last 5 years. A search (2015-2020) was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies that used the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research NIDILRR/VA-TBIMS data. Search terms were as follows: [TBIMS national database] within PubMed and Google Scholar, and [TBIMS AND national AND database] on EMBASE. Data sources, study foci (in terms of data processing and outcomes), study outcomes, and follow-up information usage were collected to categorize the studies included in this review. Variable usage in terms of TBIMS' form-based variable groups and limitations from each study were also noted. Assessment was made on how TBIMS' objectives were met by the studies. Of the 74 articles reviewed, 23 used TBIMS along with other data sets. Fifty-four studies focused on specific outcome measures only, 6 assessed data aspects as a major focus, and 13 explored both. Sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 11 to 15,835. Forty-two of the 60 longitudinal studies assessed follow-up from 1 to 5 years, and 15 studies used 10 to 25 years of the same. Prominent variable groups as outcome measures were Employment, FIM, DRS, PART-O, Satisfaction with Life, PHQ-9, and GOS-E. Limited numbers of studies were published regarding tobacco consumption, the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT), the Supervision Rating Scale (SRS), general health, and comorbidities as variables of interest. Generalizability was the most significant limitation mentioned by the studies. The TBIMS is a rich resource for large-sample longitudinal analyses of various TBI outcomes. Future efforts should focus on under-utilized variables and improving generalizability by validation of results across large-scale TBI data sets to better understand the heterogeneity of TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据