4.5 Article

Non-MTC gait cycles: An adaptive toe trajectory control strategy in older adults

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 73-79

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.044

关键词

Minimum-toe-clearance (MTC); Non-MTC gait cycles; Toe-trajectory control; Ageing; Dual task walking; Gait adaptation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimum -toe -clearance (MTC) above the walking surface is a critical representation of toe -trajectory control due to its association with tripping risk. Not all gait cycles exhibit a clearly defined MTC within the swing phase but there have been few previous accounts of the biomechanical characteristics of non-MTC gait cycles. The present report investigated the within-subject non-MTC gait cycle characteristics of 15 older adults (mean 73.1 years) and 15 young controls (mean 26.1 years). Participants performed the following tasks on a motorized treadmill: preferred speed walking, dual task walking (carrying a glass of water) and a dual-task speed-matched control. Toe position-time coordinates were acquired using a 3 dimensional motion capture system. When MTC was present, toe height at MTC (MTCheight) was extracted. The proportion of non-MTC gait cycles was computed for the age groups and individuals. For non-MTC gait cycles an 'indicative' toe height at the individual's average swing phase time (MTCtime) for observed MTC cycles was averaged across multiple non-MTC gait cycles. In preferred-speed walking Young demonstrated 2.9% non-MTC gait cycles and Older 18.7%. In constrained walking conditions both groups increased non-MTC gait cycles and some older adults revealed over 90%, confirming non-MTC gait cycles as an ageing-related phenomenon in lower limb trajectory control. For all participants median indicative toe-height on non-MTC gait cycles was greater than median MTCheight. This result suggests that eliminating the biomechanically hazardous MTC event by adopting more of the higher-clearance nonMTC gait cycles, is adaptive in reducing the likelihood of toe-ground contact. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据