4.1 Review

Characterization and development of natural gas hydrate in marine clayey-silt reservoirs: A review and discussion

期刊

ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 75-86

出版社

Yandy Scientific Press
DOI: 10.46690/ager.2021.01.08

关键词

Natural gas hydrate; reservoir characterization; hydrate development; clayey-silt sediment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42076217, 41872136]
  2. Taishan Scholar Special Experts Project [ts201712079]
  3. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFE0126400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the basic methods for natural gas hydrate reservoir characterization and development, and discusses the applicability of these methods in marine clayey-silt natural gas hydrate reservoirs. Current development methods are restricted by low gas productivity, potential geomechanical instability, and extremely high costs.
As a promising substitute for conventional fossil fuels with huge reserves, clayey-silt natural gas hydrate has been proved to be widely distributed in the continental margins of the marine environment. Characterization and development of this kind of natural gas hydrate reservoirs face unique challenges, compared with that of natural gas hydrate in marine sandy sediments. This review summarizes the basic methods for natural gas hydrate reservoir characterization and development, and discusses the applicability of these methods in marine clayey-silt natural gas hydrate reservoirs. Feasibilities of classical oil and gas reservoir characterization methods and models applied to hydrate-bearing strata remain elusive, let alone clayey-silt hydrate deposits. Current natural gas hydrate development methods are restricted by low gas productivity, potential geomechanical instability, and extremely high costs. Economically feasible technologies considering the influences of geotechnical issues are needed for the commercialization of natural gas hydrate contained in clayey-silt sediment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据