期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 50-71出版社
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2021.1833209
关键词
-
资金
- Bial Foundation [198/12, 144/14]
- Marie Sklodowska-Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme
Individuals vary significantly in responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions, impacting treatment outcomes and research reliability. Critically evaluating contemporary measures of hypnotic suggestibility has uncovered shortcomings that hinder their usefulness for current research, indicating a need for advancements in measurement methods.
The most well-established finding gleaned from decades of experimental hypnosis research is that individuals display marked variability in responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions. Insofar as this variability impacts both treatment outcome in therapeutic applications of hypnosis as well as responsiveness to suggestions in experimental contexts, it is imperative that clinicians and researchers use robust measures of hypnotic suggestibility. The current paper critically evaluates contemporary measures of hypnotic suggestibility. After reviewing the most widely used measures, we identify multiple properties of these instruments that result in the loss of valuable information, including binary scoring and single-trial sampling, and hinder their utility, such as the inclusion of suboptimal suggestion content. The scales are not well-suited for contemporary research questions and have outlived their usefulness. We conclude by outlining ways in which the measurement of hypnotic suggestibility can be advanced.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据