4.5 Article

Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649

关键词

Interprofessional education; online group work; decision making; professional hierarchy; undergraduate medical education

资金

  1. [JP18H02792]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the utility of online group work in interprofessional education, showing that group discussion can improve decision-making abilities for students, especially in mixed professional fields. However, some mixed groups may have psychological barriers leading to ineffective discussions. The study suggests instructors should be aware of potential psychological barriers in about 16% of mixed group students in interprofessional education.
Online classes have been provided for health-care pre-licensure learners during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of online group work in interprofessional education. A total of 209 students were assigned to 50 groups (18 medical student groups, 13 nursing student groups, and 19 mixed medical/nursing student groups). Learners performed group work during the orientation for the course, which was hosted using an online video conferencing system. The learners first performed the activity individually (10 min) and then engaged in a group discussion to reach consensus on their answers (30 min). We calculated the scores before and after the group discussion and shared the results with the students. Scores were improved after the group discussion (mean +/- SEM, 23.7 +/- 0.9) compared with before (37.3 +/- 1.3) (P < .0001). Lower scores after the group discussion, which indicated the effect of the group discussion on making better decisions, were observed most in the mixed medical/nursing student groups, followed by the nursing student and medical student groups. We noted only 3 groups in which the group discussion showed a negative effect on decision-making: all 3 of these groups were mixed (3 of 19 groups; 16%). These data demonstrated the power of group discussion for solving tasks when the participants' professional fields were mixed. However, the small size of the interdisciplinary groups might have resulted in less effective discussion, which might be due in part to psychological barriers arising from professional differences. Online group work is effective for facilitating discussion and building consensus about decisions in interprofessional education for medical and nursing students. Potential psychological barriers may exist in about 16% of mixed group students at the start, which should be kept in mind by instructors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据