4.7 Article

Asymmetric nexus between COVID-19 outbreak in the world and cryptocurrency market

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101613

关键词

COVID-19; Bitcoin; Top 10 Cryptocurrencies; World; Quantile-on-Quantile Regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that the changing intensity levels of COVID-19 have asymmetric impacts on the Bullish and Bearish market scenarios of cryptocurrencies, with different currencies showing varied responses to the pandemic intensity. While most currencies absorbed small shocks with positive gains, they failed to resist against large changes, except for Bitcoin, ADA, CRO, and to some extent Ethereum.
In the wake of recent pandemic of COVID-19, we explore its unprecedented impact on the cryptocurrencies' market. Specifically, we check how the changing intensity of the COVID-19 represented by the daily addition in new infections worldwide affects the daily returns of the top 10 cryptocurrencies according to the market capitalization. The results from Quantile-on-Quantile Regression (QQR) approach reveal that the changing intensity levels of the COVID-19 affect the Bearish and the Bullish market scenarios of cryptocurrencies differently (asymmetric impact). Additionally, there are differences between these currencies in their responses to the changing levels of this pandemic's intensity. Most of the currencies absorbed the small shocks of COVID-19 by registering positive gains but failed to resist against the huge changes except Bitcoin, ADA, CRO, and up to some extent Ethereum. Our results reveal new and asymmetric dynamics of this emerging asset class against an extremely stressful and unpredictable event (COVID-19). Moreover, these results are robust to the use of alternative proxy (COVID-19 deaths) for pandemic intensity. Our findings help to improve investors and policy makers' understanding of the cryptocurrencies' market dynamics, especially in the times of extremely stressful and unseen events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据