4.0 Article

A genome-wide association study identifying the SNPs predictive of rapid joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

BIOMEDICAL REPORTS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/br.2021.1407

关键词

genome-wide screening; rheumatoid arthritis; Sharp; van der Heijde score; single nucleotide polymorphisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified genetic factors, including GALNT12 and KCNN2 genes, associated with susceptibility to joint destruction in patients with RA through a genome-wide association study. These findings may offer insights into potential therapeutic targets for managing RA progression and improving functional outcomes for patients.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common chronic autoimmune disease leading to joint destruction. The aim of the present study was to identify the genomic factors predictive of susceptibility to joint destruction in patients with RA by performing a genome-wide association study of genetic variants, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The study sample included 228 patients with a diagnosis of RA in the past 5 years. Patients were classified into rapid (total Sharp score/years of RA, >= 50) and slow (total Sharp score/years of RA, <50) joint destruction groups for analysis. The association between the genome-wide SNP analysis and joint destruction was evaluated. The following SNPs were strongly associated with rapid radiographic joint destruction: rs2295926 (P<1x10(-7)), belonging to the N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12 (GALNT12) gene and rs11958855 (P<1x10(-6)), belonging to the KCNN2 gene (associated with the potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily). The identification of genetic predictors of rapid joint destruction in RA (GALNT12 and KCNN2) may provide information regarding potential therapeutic targets, and this information may be used to assist in the management RA disease progression, thereby improving the functional outcomes for patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据