4.7 Article

A new multiplicative consistency based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations

期刊

FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS
卷 315, 期 -, 页码 1-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2016.12.010

关键词

Decision analysis; TFRPR; Quasi TFRPR; Consistency analysis; Programming model

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [71431006]
  2. Projects of Major International Cooperation NSFC [71210003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571192, 71501189, 71201089, 71271217]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation of China [2015T80901]
  5. Innovation-Driven Planning Foundation of Central South University [2016CXS027]
  6. Hunan Province Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [20163-J1024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations (TFRPRs) are good choices to denote the decision makers' fuzzy preferences. Consistency analysis is a very important topic to preference relations that can avoid the illogical ranking order. However, all previous multiplicative consistency concepts for TFRPRs cannot well address this type of preference relations. To address this issue, this paper introduces a new multiplicative consistency concept for TFRPRs, which can be seen as a natural extension of Tanino's multiplicative consistency concept for reciprocal preference relations. Based on the new consistency concept, 0-1 mixed' programming models for judging the multiplicative consistency of TFRPRs are constructed, and an approach for deriving multiplicative consistent TFRPRs is provided. Considering the incomplete case, programming models to determine missing values ate constructed. Subsequently, a multiplicative consistency based method for decision making with TFRPRs is presented that can address the inconsistent and incomplete cases. Meanwhile, illustrative examples are provided to show the concrete application of the proposed procedure, and comparison analysis is also made. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据