4.6 Article

Universal lower bounds on energy and momentum diffusion in liquids

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.014311

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO's Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Programme [SEV-2012-0249]
  2. EPSRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that the thermal diffusivity of liquids and supercritical fluids has a lower bound determined by fundamental physical constants and electron and molecule masses. The theoretical minimum of thermal diffusivity aligns with the fundamental lower limit of kinematic viscosity. This indicates a significant correlation between the two transport mechanisms in different systems.
Thermal energy can be conducted by different mechanisms including by single particles or collective excitations. Thermal conductivity is system-specific and shows a richness of behaviors currently explored in different systems, including insulators, strange metals, and cuprate superconductors. Here, we show that despite the seeming complexity of thermal transport, the thermal diffusivity alpha of liquids and supercritical fluids has a lower bound that is fixed by fundamental physical constants for each system as alpha(m) = 1/4 pi h/root m(e)m, where m e and m are electron and molecule masses. The newly introduced elementary thermal diffusivity has an absolute lower bound dependent on h and the proton-to-electron mass ratio only. We back up this result by a wide range of experimental data. We also show that theoretical minima of alpha coincide with the fundamental lower limit of kinematic viscosity v(m). Consistent with experiments, this points to a universal lower bound for two distinct properties-energy and momentum diffusion-and a surprising correlation between the two transport mechanisms at their minima We observe that alpha(m) gives the minimum on the phase diagram except in the vicinity of the critical point, whereas v(m) gives the minimum on the entire phase diagram.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据