4.7 Article

Debiased Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles from X-Ray Observations and Simulations

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 908, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd0ff

关键词

Galaxy clusters; Large-scale structure of the universe; Observational cosmology; Cosmology; Intracluster medium

资金

  1. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago [PHY-1125897, AST-1714658]
  2. Kavli Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An updated model for average cluster pressure profile has been proposed, incorporating results from X-ray observations and cosmological simulations to correct hydrostatic mass bias. Analysis of existing data using this model reveals adjustments to previously inferred values for cluster masses and pressures.
We present an updated model for the average cluster pressure profile, adjusted for hydrostatic mass bias by combining results from X-ray observations with cosmological simulations. Our model estimates this bias by fitting a power law to the relation between the true halo mass and X-ray cluster mass in hydrodynamic simulations (IllustrisTNG, BAHAMAS, and MACSIS). As an example application, we consider the REXCESS X-ray cluster sample and the universal pressure profile derived from scaled and stacked pressure profiles. We find adjusted masses, M-500c, that are less than or similar to 15% higher and scaled pressures P/P-500c that have less than or similar to 35% lower normalization than previously inferred. Our debiased pressure profile (DPP) is well-fit by a generalized Navarro-Frenk-White function, with parameters [P-0, c(500), alpha, beta, gamma] = [5.048, 1.217, 1.192, 5.490, 0.433] and does not require a mass-dependent correction term. When the DPP is used to model the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect, we find that the integrated Compton Y-M relation has only minor deviations from self-similar scaling. The thermal SZ angular power spectrum is lower in amplitude by approximately 30%, assuming nominal cosmological parameters (e.g., omega(m) = 0.3, sigma(8) = 0.8), and is broadly consistent with recent Planck results without requiring additional bias corrections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据