3.9 Article

Nanoscale investigation of two-photon polymerized microstructures with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-PHOTONICS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7647/abdcba

关键词

3D nano-printing; two-photon polymerization; Raman spectroscopy; near-field enhancement

资金

  1. NSF [CMMI-1905582]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-12-00066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the use of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy on polymeric microstructures produced by two-photon polymerization direct laser writing. The TERS method shows a nearly two-fold linear enhancement compared to confocal Raman microscopy, with an estimated effective signal enhancement of about 10(4) due to the smaller probing volume. With high resolution topographical and chemical data provided by TERS, it serves as an effective analytical tool for studying the polymer network homogeneity in TPP microstructures.
We demonstrate the use of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) on polymeric microstructures fabricated by two-photon polymerization direct laser writing (TPP-DLW). Compared to the signal intensity obtained in confocal Raman microscopy, a linear enhancement of almost two times is measured when using TERS. Because the probing volume is much smaller in TERS than in confocal Raman microscopy, the effective signal enhancement is estimated to be ca. 10(4). We obtain chemical maps of TPP microstructures using TERS with relatively short acquisition times and with high spatial resolution as defined by the metallic tip apex radius of curvature. We take advantage of this high resolution to study the homogeneity of the polymer network in TPP microstructures printed in an acrylic-based resin. We find that the polymer degree of conversion varies by about 30% within a distance of only 100 nm. The combination of high resolution topographical and chemical data delivered by TERS provides an effective analytical tool for studying TPP-DLW materials in a non-destructive way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据