4.6 Review

Big data analytics meets social media: A systematic review of techniques, open issues, and future directions

期刊

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101517

关键词

Social networks; Big data; Content analysis; Sentiment analysis; Systematic literature review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social Networking Services connect people worldwide through sharing contents, photos, and videos, with big data analytics techniques commonly exploited in Social Network Analysis. The research mainly focuses on big data analytic approaches in social networks, classified into content-oriented and network-oriented methods, discussing their advantages and disadvantages.
Social Networking Services (SNSs) connect people worldwide, where they communicate through sharing contents, photos, videos, posting their first-hand opinions, comments, and following their friends. Social networks are characterized by velocity, volume, value, variety, and veracity, the 5 V's of big data. Hence, big data analytic techniques and frameworks are commonly exploited in Social Network Analysis (SNA). By the ever-increasing growth of social networks, the analysis of social data, to describe and find communication patterns among users and understand their behaviors, has attracted much attention. In this paper, we demonstrate how big data analytics meets social media, and a comprehensive review is provided on big data analytic approaches in social networks to search published studies between 2013 and August 2020, with 74 identified papers. The findings of this paper are presented in terms of main journals/conferences, yearly distributions, and the distribution of studies among publishers. Furthermore, the big data analytic approaches are classified into two main categories: Content-oriented approaches and network-oriented approaches. The main ideas, evaluation parameters, tools, evaluation methods, advantages, and disadvantages are also discussed in detail. Finally, the open challenges and future directions that are worth further investigating are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据