4.7 Article

Research topics and trends in the maritime transport: A structural topic model

期刊

TRANSPORT POLICY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 11-24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.013

关键词

Maritime transport; Shipping; Port; Text mining; Structural topic model; Research trends

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [72001123, 72031005]
  2. Key project of Philosophy and Social Science Research of Ministry of Education, PRC [20JZD016]
  3. Center for Smart Logistics and Supply Chain Systems, Tsinghua University, China [THUCSL20182911756-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maritime transport is crucial for global trade and has seen a shift in research focus from regulatory aspects to efficiency, integration, and sustainability. The use of a structural topic model has helped identify key research themes and trends in the maritime literature, aiding researchers, funding groups, and policymakers in making informed decisions.
Maritime transport is considered as the lynchpin of global trade. In the past decades, a large number of academic articles in the maritime transport field have been published. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the development of maritime transport research. A structural topic model (STM) is adopted to analyze the research themes and trends in the maritime literature. STM is a text mining-based methodology to uncover main topics from large-scale unstructured textual data. In total, 3199 articles published between Jan 1991 and Aug 2020 were collected and analyzed. The results show that the major academic concerns of maritime transport are related to port management, container operations and liner shipping management. The overall research trends have shifted from regulations and policy management to efficient, integrated and sustainable maritime transport over the past few decades. The main research topics and emerging trends discovered from STM can facilitate researchers, funding groups and policymakers for identifying contemporary research issues and making more informed decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据