4.8 Article

Decoding the multicellular ecosystem of lung adenocarcinoma manifested as pulmonary subsolid nodules by single-cell RNA sequencing

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd9738

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81702256, 81871879, 81772469]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [7182169]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX10302205, 2019YFC1315702]
  4. Guangdong Province Key Research and Development Program [2019B020226002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides single-cell transcriptomic profiling of SSN and their TME, revealing that cytotoxic natural killer/I cells dominate the TME of SSN, and malignant cells in SSN undergo metabolic reprogramming and immune stress. Furthermore, the subtype composition of endothelial cells in SSN is similar to that in mLUAD, while the subtype distribution of fibroblasts is more like that in nLung.
Lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) that radiologically display as subsolid nodules (SSNs) exhibit more indolent biological behavior than solid LUAD. The transcriptomic features and tumor microenvironment (TME) of SSN remain poorly understood. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing analyses of 16 SSN samples, 6 adjacent normal lung tissues (nLung), and 9 primary LUAD with lymph node metastasis (mLUAD). Approximately 0.6 billion unique transcripts were obtained from 118,293 cells. We found that cytotoxic natural killer/I cells were dominant in the TME of SSN, and malignant cells in SSN undergo a strong metabolic reprogram and immune stress. In SSN, the subtype composition of endothelial cells was similar to that in mLUAD, while the subtype distribution of fibro-blasts was more like that in nLung. Our study provides single-cell transcriptomic profiling of SSN and their TME. This resource provides deeper insight into the indolent nature of SSN and will be helpful in advancing lung cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据